This language is suitable for real-time applications
Based on responses from 1888 people, we've built up the following picture of how well "This language is suitable for real-time applications" describes different items
Not ranked this statement, or changed your mind about your previous ranking? Why not go rank it ?
Bottom items
What's going on here?
We've taken all your individual votes and done our best to assemble them into an overall ordering of items. It wasn't easy! There are all sorts of internal contradictions in majority voting.
For items where we've got a lot of responses the numbers should be pretty good. For the rest you can probably just expect them to hang around the middle of the rankings wondering what they're doing here.
Most similar to
- Programs written in this language tend to be efficient
- I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
- I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
- This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
- I would use this language for writing embedded programs
Most dissimilar from
- I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
- This language is best for very small projects
- This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
- I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application
- This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
All items
- C
- Assembler
- Ada
- Forth
- C++
- Eiffel
- D
- Go
- Erlang
- O'Caml
- J
- Agda
- Objective C
- C#
- Java
- Standard ML
- ActionScript
- REBOL
- Mozart-Oz
- Scala
- Fortran
- Haskell
- Pascal
- F#
- Common Lisp
- Delphi
- Clojure
- Scheme
- Haxe
- Factor
- APL
- Lua
- Python
- R
- Smalltalk
- Io
- Groovy
- Ruby
- Perl
- TCL
- Mathematica
- Coq
- Javascript
- Cobol
- Matlab
- AWK
- ELisp
- Visual Basic
- Shell
- Prolog
- PHP
