This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
Based on responses from 1258 people, we've built up the following picture of how well "This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete)." describes different items
Not ranked this statement, or changed your mind about your previous ranking? Why not go rank it ?
Bottom items
What's going on here?
We've taken all your individual votes and done our best to assemble them into an overall ordering of items. It wasn't easy! There are all sorts of internal contradictions in majority voting.
For items where we've got a lot of responses the numbers should be pretty good. For the rest you can probably just expect them to hang around the middle of the rankings wondering what they're doing here.
Most similar to
Most dissimilar from
- The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
- Code written in this language tends to be verbose
- I use a lot of code written in this language which I really don't want to have to make changes to
- Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
- This is a low level language
All items
- Agda
- AWK
- J
- Matlab
- Prolog
- Shell
- Mathematica
- Scheme
- Io
- Lua
- Groovy
- Go
- Haskell
- R
- Forth
- Clojure
- Coq
- Erlang
- F#
- ELisp
- Factor
- Python
- Smalltalk
- Haxe
- Ruby
- Eiffel
- Javascript
- APL
- Delphi
- O'Caml
- Visual Basic
- Common Lisp
- Fortran
- D
- Scala
- PHP
- Perl
- C#
- Java
- Mozart-Oz
- TCL
- Ada
- C
- Objective C
- Pascal
- Standard ML
- C++
- Cobol
- Assembler