This language encourages writing reusable code.
Based on responses from 1289 people, we've built up the following picture of how well "This language encourages writing reusable code." describes different items
Not ranked this statement, or changed your mind about your previous ranking? Why not go rank it ?
What's going on here?
We've taken all your individual votes and done our best to assemble them into an overall ordering of items. It wasn't easy! There are all sorts of internal contradictions in majority voting.
For items where we've got a lot of responses the numbers should be pretty good. For the rest you can probably just expect them to hang around the middle of the rankings wondering what they're doing here.
Most similar to
- This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.
- This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces
- This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages
- I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code
- This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity
Most dissimilar from
- This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
- The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
- I often get angry when writing code in this language
- This language has an annoying syntax
- Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
All items
- Haskell
- Clojure
- Scala
- Smalltalk
- Python
- Common Lisp
- Ruby
- O'Caml
- F#
- C#
- Java
- Scheme
- D
- Ada
- Haxe
- Eiffel
- Objective C
- Factor
- Standard ML
- Mozart-Oz
- Io
- Coq
- Go
- J
- Erlang
- APL
- REBOL
- Groovy
- Mathematica
- ELisp
- C++
- R
- Lua
- C
- Forth
- Delphi
- TCL
- Javascript
- Matlab
- Pascal
- Cobol
- Fortran
- Perl
- PHP
- Visual Basic
- Prolog
- Shell
- AWK
- Assembler
