Based on responses from 2328 people, we've built up the following picture of how well "I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform" describes different programming languages.
I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
Bottom items
Most similar to
- This language is suitable for real-time applications
- Programs written in this language tend to be efficient
- This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
- I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
- I would use this language for writing embedded programs
Most dissimilar from
- This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
- I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
- I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language
- I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language
- This language has an annoying syntax
All items
- C
- Forth
- Assembler
- C++
- Ada
- D
- Go
- Lua
- Java
- Scheme
- Erlang
- O'Caml
- Objective C
- Scala
- Haskell
- Standard ML
- Agda
- Common Lisp
- Haxe
- Eiffel
- C#
- Python
- Pascal
- TCL
- Factor
- Mathematica
- F#
- Clojure
- Io
- Groovy
- Coq
- Smalltalk
- Mozart-Oz
- Fortran
- Ruby
- J
- Delphi
- R
- APL
- Matlab
- Perl
- Javascript
- Shell
- Prolog
- AWK
- ELisp
- Visual Basic
- Cobol
- PHP