I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"
Based on responses from 2077 people, we've built up the following picture of how well "I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"" describes different items
Not ranked this statement, or changed your mind about your previous ranking? Why not go rank it ?
Bottom items
What's going on here?
We've taken all your individual votes and done our best to assemble them into an overall ordering of items. It wasn't easy! There are all sorts of internal contradictions in majority voting.
For items where we've got a lot of responses the numbers should be pretty good. For the rest you can probably just expect them to hang around the middle of the rankings wondering what they're doing here.
Most similar to
- The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.
- This language is minimal
- This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features
- This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
- This language has a very coherent design
All items
- Eiffel
- Forth
- Prolog
- ELisp
- J
- Factor
- Scheme
- Haskell
- R
- Io
- APL
- Matlab
- Haxe
- AWK
- Assembler
- Clojure
- Mathematica
- Pascal
- O'Caml
- ActionScript
- Standard ML
- Smalltalk
- Common Lisp
- Erlang
- Mozart-Oz
- Lua
- Cobol
- Go
- D
- TCL
- Visual Basic
- Groovy
- F#
- PHP
- Perl
- Coq
- Fortran
- Shell
- Ruby
- Javascript
- Ada
- Objective C
- Delphi
- Python
- Scala
- C++
- C
- C#
- Java
