Ruby

All statements

1. This language is well suited for an agile development approach using short iterations.
2. This language has a good library distribution mechanism.
3. I would use this language for casual scripting
4. This language excels at text processing
5. I find this language easy to prototype in
6. I would use this language for a web project
7. This language is very flexible
8. I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application
9. This language would be good for teaching children to write software
10. This language is best for very small projects
11. This language is expressive
12. Code written in this language is very readable
13. This language is likely to be a passing fad
14. I would use this language to write a command-line app
15. This is a high level language
16. This language is good for beginners
17. Code written in this language tends to be terse
18. I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
19. I find code written in this language very elegant
20. I enjoy using this language
21. This language has a good community
22. I still discover new features of this language on a fairly regular basis
23. This language has unusual features that I often miss when using other languages
24. This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages
25. I usually use this language on solo projects
26. I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code
27. I would like to write more of this language than I currently do
28. This language has a very dogmatic community
29. This language encourages writing reusable code.
30. I use this language out of choice
31. It is easy to tell at a glance what code in this language does
32. There are many good open-source tools for this language
33. There is a wide variety of open source code written in this language
34. It is too easy to write code in this language that looks like it does one thing but actually does something else
35. This language excels at symbolic manipulation
36. I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"
37. This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.
38. I can imagine using this language in my day job
39. I would use this language for a desktop GUI project
40. I can imagine this will be a popular language in twenty years time
41. I regularly use this language
42. This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces
43. The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.
44. I would list this language on my resume
45. The resources for learning this language are of high quality
46. This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity
47. Learning this language significantly changed how I use other languages.
48. I usually use this language on projects with many other members
49. Third-party libraries are readily available, well-documented, and of high quality
50. This language is frequently used for applications it isn't suitable for
51. This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
52. I would use this language for writing server programs
53. This language has many features which feel "tacked on"
54. This language is large
55. Learning this language improved my ability as a programmer
56. I would recommend most programmers learn this language, regardless of whether they have a specific need for it
57. When I run into problems my colleagues can provide me with immediate help with this language
58. It is easy to debug programs written in this language when it goes wrong
59. This language has a niche in which it is great
60. Libraries in this language tend to be well documented.
61. I know many other people who use this language
62. I know this language well
63. There are many good tools for this language
64. This language is best for very large projects
65. This language has a very coherent design
66. I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language
67. This language matches it's problem domain particularly well.
68. I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language
69. I often get angry when writing code in this language
70. When I write code in this language I can be very sure it is correct
71. Programs written in this language tend to play well with others
72. This language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot
73. I use a lot of code written in this language which I really don't want to have to make changes to
74. I often feel like I am not smart enough to write this language
75. I would use this language for mobile applications
76. This language is good for distributed computing
77. This is a mainstream language
78. This language is well documented
79. Code written in this language will usually run in all the major implementations if it runs in one of them.
80. If this language didn't exist, I would have trouble finding a satisfactory replacement
81. This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
82. I use many applications written in this language
83. Code written in this language tends to be very reliable
84. This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features
85. Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
86. There is a lot of accidental complexity when writing code in this language
87. This language is minimal
88. It's unusual for me to discover unfamiliar features
89. The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
90. This language has an annoying syntax
91. If my code in this language successfully compiles, there is a good chance my code is correct.
92. There are many good commercial tools for this language
93. This language excels at concurrency
94. This language is good for scientific computing
95. This language is good for numeric computing
96. This language is likely to be around for a very long time
97. Programs written in this language will usually work in future versions of the language
98. I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
99. This language is unusually bad for beginners
100. This language has a high quality implementation
101. I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
102. This language has a very rigid idea of how things should be done
103. I would use this language for writing embedded programs
104. This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
105. This language is suitable for real-time applications
106. I learned this language early in my career as a programmer
107. Code written in this language tends to be verbose
108. This is a low level language
109. This language has a strong static type system
110. Writing code in this language is a lot of work
111. Programs written in this language tend to be efficient