Lua

Based on 18437 responses from 1563 people, we've built up the following picture of Lua

Most similar to

  1. Io
  2. Scheme
  3. Smalltalk
  4. Clojure
  5. TCL

Most dissimilar from

  1. C++
  2. Java
  3. C
  4. Fortran
  5. Cobol

All statements

  1. I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application
  2. This language is minimal
  3. This language would be good for teaching children to write software
  4. This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features
  5. I would use this language for casual scripting
  6. This language has a very coherent design
  7. This language is good for beginners
  8. This language has a niche in which it is great
  9. Code written in this language is very readable
  10. I find this language easy to prototype in
  11. Code written in this language will usually run in all the major implementations if it runs in one of them.
  12. This language is likely to be a passing fad
  13. This language is very flexible
  14. This language is well suited for an agile development approach using short iterations.
  15. I would like to write more of this language than I currently do
  16. This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
  17. I would use this language for mobile applications
  18. This language is best for very small projects
  19. I find code written in this language very elegant
  20. It is easy to tell at a glance what code in this language does
  21. I enjoy using this language
  22. I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
  23. This language has a high quality implementation
  24. Programs written in this language tend to play well with others
  25. This language has unusual features that I often miss when using other languages
  26. This language matches it's problem domain particularly well.
  27. This is a high level language
  28. I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code
  29. It's unusual for me to discover unfamiliar features
  30. I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"
  31. Code written in this language tends to be terse
  32. This language excels at symbolic manipulation
  33. This language is expressive
  34. This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
  35. I would use this language for writing embedded programs
  36. I would recommend most programmers learn this language, regardless of whether they have a specific need for it
  37. This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.
  38. I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
  39. I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language
  40. If this language didn't exist, I would have trouble finding a satisfactory replacement
  41. The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.
  42. I use this language out of choice
  43. This language has a good community
  44. This language excels at text processing
  45. This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
  46. I would use this language to write a command-line app
  47. This language has a good library distribution mechanism.
  48. I usually use this language on solo projects
  49. Learning this language significantly changed how I use other languages.
  50. This language is suitable for real-time applications
  51. It is easy to debug programs written in this language when it goes wrong
  52. I can imagine this will be a popular language in twenty years time
  53. I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language
  54. Code written in this language tends to be very reliable
  55. The resources for learning this language are of high quality
  56. This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces
  57. When I write code in this language I can be very sure it is correct
  58. I would use this language for a web project
  59. I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
  60. I can imagine using this language in my day job
  61. Programs written in this language will usually work in future versions of the language
  62. This language encourages writing reusable code.
  63. This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity
  64. I regularly use this language
  65. This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages
  66. I would use this language for a desktop GUI project
  67. This language is good for distributed computing
  68. Learning this language improved my ability as a programmer
  69. Programs written in this language tend to be efficient
  70. This language excels at concurrency
  71. This language is well documented
  72. This is a low level language
  73. It is too easy to write code in this language that looks like it does one thing but actually does something else
  74. I still discover new features of this language on a fairly regular basis
  75. I would use this language for writing server programs
  76. Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
  77. I would list this language on my resume
  78. If my code in this language successfully compiles, there is a good chance my code is correct.
  79. I usually use this language on projects with many other members
  80. I often feel like I am not smart enough to write this language
  81. The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
  82. Code written in this language tends to be verbose
  83. I know this language well
  84. When I run into problems my colleagues can provide me with immediate help with this language
  85. Third-party libraries are readily available, well-documented, and of high quality
  86. This language is frequently used for applications it isn't suitable for
  87. This language has a very rigid idea of how things should be done
  88. This language is good for numeric computing
  89. This language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot
  90. Libraries in this language tend to be well documented.
  91. This language is best for very large projects
  92. There are many good commercial tools for this language
  93. There is a lot of accidental complexity when writing code in this language
  94. This language is good for scientific computing
  95. There are many good open-source tools for this language
  96. This language has an annoying syntax
  97. There is a wide variety of open source code written in this language
  98. This language has a very dogmatic community
  99. This language has many features which feel "tacked on"
  100. This language has a strong static type system
  101. I use many applications written in this language
  102. There are many good tools for this language
  103. I know many other people who use this language
  104. I learned this language early in my career as a programmer
  105. Writing code in this language is a lot of work
  106. I use a lot of code written in this language which I really don't want to have to make changes to
  107. I often get angry when writing code in this language
  108. This language is likely to be around for a very long time
  109. This is a mainstream language
  110. This language is unusually bad for beginners
  111. This language is large