Cobol

Based on 7047 responses from 590 people, we've built up the following picture of Cobol

Most dissimilar from

  1. Python
  2. Clojure
  3. Ruby
  4. Scala
  5. Haxe

All statements

  1. Code written in this language tends to be verbose
  2. The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
  3. I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language
  4. I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language
  5. This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
  6. Writing code in this language is a lot of work
  7. This language has an annoying syntax
  8. I often get angry when writing code in this language
  9. This language has a very rigid idea of how things should be done
  10. I learned this language early in my career as a programmer
  11. Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
  12. It is easy to tell at a glance what code in this language does
  13. Code written in this language is very readable
  14. The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.
  15. There is a lot of accidental complexity when writing code in this language
  16. This language is large
  17. This language is unusually bad for beginners
  18. This language has a strong static type system
  19. This language has a very dogmatic community
  20. Code written in this language tends to be very reliable
  21. Programs written in this language will usually work in future versions of the language
  22. If my code in this language successfully compiles, there is a good chance my code is correct.
  23. It's unusual for me to discover unfamiliar features
  24. This is a high level language
  25. I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"
  26. This language has many features which feel "tacked on"
  27. I use a lot of code written in this language which I really don't want to have to make changes to
  28. This language is frequently used for applications it isn't suitable for
  29. This is a low level language
  30. This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
  31. This language is likely to be a passing fad
  32. This language matches it's problem domain particularly well.
  33. When I write code in this language I can be very sure it is correct
  34. I usually use this language on projects with many other members
  35. This language has a niche in which it is great
  36. This language is likely to be around for a very long time
  37. This language is best for very large projects
  38. This language has a high quality implementation
  39. This language has a very coherent design
  40. This is a mainstream language
  41. This language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot
  42. This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.
  43. This language is good for numeric computing
  44. This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity
  45. There are many good commercial tools for this language
  46. This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces
  47. This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
  48. If this language didn't exist, I would have trouble finding a satisfactory replacement
  49. This language is well documented
  50. I would use this language for writing embedded programs
  51. It is too easy to write code in this language that looks like it does one thing but actually does something else
  52. I would use this language for writing server programs
  53. Programs written in this language tend to be efficient
  54. This language is minimal
  55. The resources for learning this language are of high quality
  56. It is easy to debug programs written in this language when it goes wrong
  57. Code written in this language will usually run in all the major implementations if it runs in one of them.
  58. When I run into problems my colleagues can provide me with immediate help with this language
  59. Third-party libraries are readily available, well-documented, and of high quality
  60. This language is good for distributed computing
  61. This language is expressive
  62. I often feel like I am not smart enough to write this language
  63. I know many other people who use this language
  64. Libraries in this language tend to be well documented.
  65. I would list this language on my resume
  66. This language is good for beginners
  67. This language excels at text processing
  68. This language excels at concurrency
  69. Programs written in this language tend to play well with others
  70. This language would be good for teaching children to write software
  71. I would use this language for a desktop GUI project
  72. This language excels at symbolic manipulation
  73. There are many good open-source tools for this language
  74. I usually use this language on solo projects
  75. I find code written in this language very elegant
  76. I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application
  77. This language is best for very small projects
  78. I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
  79. This language is suitable for real-time applications
  80. I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code
  81. Code written in this language tends to be terse
  82. This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features
  83. There are many good tools for this language
  84. I can imagine this will be a popular language in twenty years time
  85. I know this language well
  86. This language is good for scientific computing
  87. I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
  88. This language encourages writing reusable code.
  89. I would use this language to write a command-line app
  90. Learning this language significantly changed how I use other languages.
  91. I enjoy using this language
  92. This language has a good library distribution mechanism.
  93. This language has unusual features that I often miss when using other languages
  94. I find this language easy to prototype in
  95. I can imagine using this language in my day job
  96. I would like to write more of this language than I currently do
  97. I use many applications written in this language
  98. I would use this language for a web project
  99. I regularly use this language
  100. I use this language out of choice
  101. I still discover new features of this language on a fairly regular basis
  102. I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
  103. This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages
  104. I would use this language for mobile applications
  105. This language is well suited for an agile development approach using short iterations.
  106. This language has a good community
  107. I would recommend most programmers learn this language, regardless of whether they have a specific need for it
  108. I would use this language for casual scripting
  109. This language is very flexible
  110. There is a wide variety of open source code written in this language
  111. Learning this language improved my ability as a programmer