Ada

All statements

1. If my code in this language successfully compiles, there is a good chance my code is correct.
2. This language encourages writing code that is easy to maintain.
3. This language has a strong static type system
4. Code written in this language tends to be very reliable
5. This language is large
6. This language is suitable for real-time applications
7. This language is best for very large projects
8. Code written in this language tends to be verbose
9. This language has a very rigid idea of how things should be done
10. When I write code in this language I can be very sure it is correct
11. I would use this language for writing programs for an embedded hardware platform
12. This language has a very dogmatic community
13. This language excels at concurrency
14. Programs written in this language will usually work in future versions of the language
15. Code written in this language is very readable
16. This language encourages writing reusable code.
17. This language is well documented
18. It is easy to tell at a glance what code in this language does
19. This language is good for distributed computing
20. This language is good for numeric computing
21. Learning this language significantly changed how I use other languages.
22. This language matches it's problem domain particularly well.
23. Code written in this language will usually run in all the major implementations if it runs in one of them.
24. This language has a niche in which it is great
25. I would like to write more of this language than I currently do
26. This language is good for scientific computing
27. Learning this language improved my ability as a programmer
28. This language has a high quality implementation
29. This language has a very coherent design
30. There is a lot of accidental complexity when writing code in this language
31. I usually use this language on projects with many other members
32. I would use this language for writing embedded programs
33. I am sometimes embarrassed to admit to my peers that I know this language
34. This language has well-organized libraries with consistent, carefully thought-out interfaces
35. I would use this language for writing server programs
36. Programs written in this language tend to be efficient
37. Writing code in this language is a lot of work
38. This language has unusual features that I often miss when using other languages
39. This language allows me to write programs where I know exactly what they are doing under the hood
40. This is a low level language
41. This language is expressive
42. This language is good for beginners
43. I rarely have difficulty abstracting patterns I find in my code
44. I find it easy to write efficient code in this language
45. I find code written in this language very elegant
46. I would use this language to write a command-line app
47. It is easy to debug programs written in this language when it goes wrong
48. Developers who primarily use this language often burn out after a few years
49. The semantics of this language are much different than other languages I know.
50. This language has many features which feel "tacked on"
51. This language is unusually bad for beginners
52. This language has a wide variety of agreed-upon conventions, which are generally adhered to reasonably well, and which increase my productivity
53. I would recommend most programmers learn this language, regardless of whether they have a specific need for it
54. I would list this language on my resume
55. Programs written in this language tend to play well with others
56. This language would be good for teaching children to write software
57. If this language didn't exist, I would have trouble finding a satisfactory replacement
58. I am reluctant to admit to knowing this language
59. This language has a good library distribution mechanism.
60. This language is likely to be a passing fad
61. I often get angry when writing code in this language
62. Libraries in this language tend to be well documented.
63. This language is easier to use for it's problem domain by removing unneeded expressiveness (such as not being Turing complete).
64. This is a high level language
65. The thought that I may still be using this language in twenty years time fills me with dread
66. I often feel like I am not smart enough to write this language
67. I use a lot of code written in this language which I really don't want to have to make changes to
68. The resources for learning this language are of high quality
69. It's unusual for me to discover unfamiliar features
70. I still discover new features of this language on a fairly regular basis
71. This language has a niche outside of which I would not use it
72. I would use this language for mobile applications
73. This language is built on a small core of orthogonal features
74. When I run into problems my colleagues can provide me with immediate help with this language
75. This language is likely to have a strong influence on future languages
76. I enjoy using this language
77. I can imagine using this language in my day job
78. This language excels at text processing
79. I use this language out of choice
80. I enjoy playing with this language but would never use it for "real code"
81. This language excels at symbolic manipulation
82. This language is very flexible
83. I would use this language for a web project
84. I learned this language early in my career as a programmer
85. This language is well suited for an agile development approach using short iterations.
86. There are many good tools for this language
87. There are many good commercial tools for this language
88. Third-party libraries are readily available, well-documented, and of high quality
89. This language is likely to be around for a very long time
90. I would use this language for a desktop GUI project
91. I find this language easy to prototype in
92. This language has a good community
93. This language has an annoying syntax
94. I know many other people who use this language
95. I can imagine this will be a popular language in twenty years time
96. I usually use this language on solo projects
97. There are many good open-source tools for this language
98. I regularly use this language
99. I often write things in this language with the intent of rewriting them in something else later
100. This language is minimal
101. This language is frequently used for applications it isn't suitable for
102. I use many applications written in this language
103. I would use this language for casual scripting
104. It is too easy to write code in this language that looks like it does one thing but actually does something else
105. I would use this language as a scripting language embedded inside a larger application
106. I know this language well
107. This is a mainstream language
108. This language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot
109. This language is best for very small projects
110. Code written in this language tends to be terse
111. There is a wide variety of open source code written in this language